Showing posts with label Tea Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tea Party. Show all posts

Thursday, January 3, 2013

That Was Our Gal: Sing It High, Sing It Low!


Today she became history!
Ding, Dong, The Witch is Dead!

Ding Dong! The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch! 
Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.
Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed.
Wake up, the Wicked Witch is dead. She's gone where the goblins go,
Below - below - below. Yo-ho, let's open up and sing and ring the bells out.
Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low.
Let them know 
The Wicked Witch is dead!

A fraud and an enormous waste of our taxpayer dollars. Playing us for stupid beyond comprehension every single day of her term. Compulsive liar. Able to make grown men lust and lose their minds. Lie and smile; smile and lie. 

Don't get Blue Sky Girl started.

Monday, November 5, 2012

FORTY LIES IN 40 DAYS: #40 Buerkle Doesn't Publicly Admit to Climate Change

So far to the right on climate change, she is one of the Flat Earth Five according to the League of Conservation Voters. Blue Sky Girl thinks that Buerkle is pandering to her base of science-free Tea Drinkers.

According to the League of Conservation Voters:

...Rep. Buerkle ... has claimed that “a lot of the global warming myth has been exposed.”
“Rep. Buerkle’s extreme views put her at odds with scientists, the Pentagon and her constituents,” said Gene Karpinski, President of the League of Conservation Voters.
Despite overwhelming scientific evidence that humans are contributing to climate change, Rep. Buerkle has referred to “the global warming myth” and claimed that “the jury is still out” on the issue. 
In response, Central New York scientists have condemned Rep. Buerkle’s climate denial. The Syracuse Post Standard quoted Cornelius Murphy, president of the State University College of Environmental Science and Forestry, as saying of Rep. Buerkle’s stance, “This has been known by scientists for decades…This demands action, not denial. Climate change is real.”
Blue Sky Girl wonders if Buerkle would like to take her pandering to the people of New Jersey and lower New York right now? To Governors Cuomo and Christie, and to Mayor Bloomberg?

Thursday, October 18, 2012

FORTY LIES IN 40 DAYS: #22 Buerkle Will Go to Washington With an Open and Independent Mind

Buerkle voted with the Republican/Tea Party block 95% of the time so far in her Congressional term.

She did this in spite of saying the following in Compact25 in August, 2010:

I will be independent
I will be the voice of the people and not the voice of a party, a President, or a special interest group. The only special interest group I’ll be listening to is the people of the 25th District of New York.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Buerkle Meets the Gays

Update: Homophobe KSE heatedly commented here that gay conservative Republican group, Log Cabin Republicans, was not a sponsor for this fundraising event for Buerkle. Blueskygirl's blog post made him blister.

Beep beep ... last minute scramble! Apparently Buerkle was able to get the Auburn blog, auburnpub.com, to print a retraction on the day of the event, Feb. 9. She correctly anticipated having a tough go of it with phobe phans.

Blueskygirl begs to differ as she continues to find evidence on February 27 to the contrary. Also, Blueskygirl doesn't buy that syr.com fabricated the quotes in its article from Mr. Berle. Dear commenter: u mad.


Update: Blueskygirl posted a slightly different version of this post on Daily Kos and has received some terrific comments there. Thanks everyone!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The original article:

Teapartiers, do your know where your US Representative Ann Marie Buerkle, NY 25, is?

Buerkle will be honored tonight in Washington by Log Cabin Republicans for her conservative agenda. Log Cabin Republicans share many values with moderates and progressives. In this case they are, if nothing else, utilitarian, and Blueskygirl thinks they are caught in an awkward position. 

Buerkle personally gets super high points for cynicism on this one.

Buerkle's history on gay issues is anything but stellar. Please read Blueskygirl's article from last year about Buerkle's very short tenure on the Syracuse Common Council eighteen years ago.

From the article earlier this week in syr.com

[Christian] Berle [Deputy ED of Log Cabin Republicans] said he understands that Buerkle is a "strong social conservative" but added, "We, of course, look to engage with legislators at every opportunity to discuss our agenda. We have met with members of Congress who have done a complete 180 on gay rights issues." 

Good luck with Buerkle, Mr Berle. How we in Syracuse would love to see a shift.

But folks, don't be offended if she wears surgical gloves tonight. Her belief system is pretty fixed.

See syr.com's article from February 7, reprinted at bottom of this page, for more details.

Side note, of interest: The LCR event tonight is sponsored by One Nation PAC. Its website has almost no content. It actually did endorse Nevada's racist losing Senate candidate Sharron Angle and our own Adirondacker Doug Hoffman in 2010. No new news since then. Languishing, waiting for just that right moment to endorse more nonsense Tea Partiers in the coming election, no doubt. One Nation PAC's mission statement:

One Nation PAC is a conservative political action committee dedicated to limited government, economic prosperity, and traditional values.  We fight for lower taxes, strong national defense, the 2nd Amendment, common sense healthcare, superior education, and right to life.

syr.com article from February 7, 2010 announcing Log Cabin Republicans' honoring of Ann Marie Buerkle tonight, Thursday, February 9, 2012:

Republican gay rights advocates to honor U.S. Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle
Published: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 Mark Weiner

Washington -- As an unwavering conservative, Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle has never supported same-sex marriage or other equality initiatives proposed by the gay community. But that won't stop Washington, D.C.'s largest gay Republican group from honoring her on Thursday.

The Log Cabin Republicans, the only national GOP organization dedicated to representing the interests of gays and lesbians, will honor Buerkle and three other House Republicans at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington.

The fundraising reception hosted by the Log Cabin Republicans and One Nation PAC will include a keynote speech by former Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich and special guest Grover Norquist, the anti-tax crusader.

Christian Berle, the deputy executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans, said in an interview that he is aware that Buerkle, R-Onondaga Hill, is not a supporter on gay rights issues.

"We're recognizing members of Congress for their positions on fiscal issues, and she has been a hawk on the Balanced Budget Amendment and fiscal matters," Berle said of Thursday's event. "We find ourselves working with many different organizations on fiscal matters."

Berle said he understands that Buerkle is a "strong social conservative" but added, "We, of course, look to engage with legislators at every opportunity to discuss our agenda. We have met with members of Congress who have done a complete 180 on gay rights issues."

The Log Cabin Republicans prominently feature a photo on their Web site of U.S. Rep. Richard Hanna, R-Barneveld, Buerkle's neighbor in the 24th Congressional District. Hanna, a supporter of gay rights issues, is featured as one of the "Republican Champions of Liberty."

Tickets to the fundraising event, billed as a "Scotch and Cigars" reception range from $20 to $1,000 per person.

Friday, December 23, 2011

Coal in Your Stocking, Buerkle

"Naughty or Nice?" by Ed Hall 12/23/11, Kaiser Health News


Ms. Buerkle, thousands of people who live in HR Congressional District NY 25 have nary a reason to wish you a Merry Christmas this year. 

These were to be your Holiday presents to them come January 1 had Speaker Boehner not finally seen the light:

  • elimination of Federal Long-term Unemployment benefits for over 13,000 long-term unemployed people in your district; 
  • a  cut of 27% in Medicare payments to doctors who treat patients enrolled in Medicare, severely affecting their practices, staffs and patients;
  • the loss of $50 on average per paycheck to employed people in your district via payroll tax increases.

Blueskygirl wonders if you have you ever lived in circumstances in which $300 a week was all that was standing between you and poverty? 

No Merry Christmas to you, sad shortsighted woman.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Another Ann Marie Buerkle Stunt: Medicare and Hospitals

For Immediate Release   
Date: December 14, 2011
Contact: Liza Lowery
(315)559-9388
Rep. Buerkle Introduces Legislation
to Help Hospitals
Washington, DC - Today, Congresswoman Ann Marie Buerkle (NY-25) introduced the Help 
Our Hospitals Act of 2011, which repeals a section of the President’s Health Care Law that cuts 
Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments to hospitals. ...

This is a legislative stunt. It is another Ann Marie Buerkle/Tea Party/Republican attempt to gut the 2010 Health Care Law and nothing more. Since the Health Care bill passed, Republicans have been intent upon defeating any comprehensive health care laws and with defeating President Obama with a crudeness that feels racist.

Our gal Buerkle is congenitally incapable of posing both sides of any complicated issue. In this instance, a Google search shows that the primary web sites concerned with this issue of Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments to hospitals are large corporate law firms who represent hospitals.

The truth is that at this time no one can say with assurance what the total effect will be upon hospitals receiving DSH payments. Shifts in how care presently being paid for by Medicare are assured in 2014. The Health Care Law has the means to make up the difference to hospitals in other ways using more direct and simplified formulas. Buerkle is unwilling to recognize this publicly or to discuss it.

For a enlightening discussion of the effects of redistribution of risk that changes in health care will make upon hospitals receiving DSH funds, see this Brookings Institute paper.


Thursday, December 8, 2011

Captain Regulation on the Balance of Power and the Interests of Big Business

ring...ring...

Captain Regulation: Hello Ms. Buerkle. It has been awhile. What's up?

Representative Ann Marie Buerkle: REINS [Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act: see the Washington Post's article yesterday for a full explanation]. We have been working hard to streamline government regulations. What do you think?

CR: I am afraid you and your colleagues have missed the point of strong regulations again. What you've done is about ideology rather than good government. Also, you are trying to tinker with the balance of power. Don't you remember what you learned in your 9th grade civics course about balancing the three parts of government?

AMB: We think the President has too much power.

CR: Please let me explain something to you. One of the advantages of regulations is continuity. Because the balance of power can shift so quickly, in fact every two years in the House and four years in the Presidency, without regulations things can become unmanageable rather quickly, creating chaos and confusion. Quite simply, there has to be some stability we can all depend upon, and regulations contribute greatly to that.

AMB: But we like using words like "certainty" and "job creators". We want the American people to believe that we have their best interests at heart.

CR: Do you?

AMB: To the extent that big business uses an expendable and cheap labor force, yes.

CR: What? And what about the consumer and community protections REINS would erode?

AMB: I am always in favor of consumer protections so long as they do not reduce the ability of corporations to maximize their profits.

CR: Sorry, you are not making sense. Not only that, but Lisa Lowery's headline this morning, Rep. Buerkle Stands Up for Businesses, is  deceptive and really not true at all for local concerns. It promotes your false contention that the interests of big business are compatible with the interests of workers, local businesses and communities.

AMB: But we are in the business of getting our point across in small bites. We know that our Tea Party supporters don't read deeply or care about facts.

CR: Honestly, Ms. Buerkle, I do not understand why you and your Republican colleagues waste so much time with stunts like this when you have so many more important issues to deal with right now.

AMB: [click]

CR: [to colleagues working nearby] Buerkle again…Tea Party politics as usual. Nothing to do with good government. Back to work. I swear she would be happiest taking us back to the Dark Ages, like yesterday when she came out against new protections for children employed in farming who have been working with pesticides, powerful PTOs and in giant silos and manure ponds.

Monday, October 31, 2011

Politics of Tea and Buerkle

It's enough to give Blueskygirl a good day!  

Ann Marie Buerkle's big splash in Washington is drying up because of her own inaction and blinders.

We from her own district knew from before day one that she is from the Triassic. Dinosaur-like, she cannot change and grow. From her simple-minded, uncomplicated hatred of Planned Parenthood and "government get out of our business, women's uteruses excluded" mentality to her flag-waving pandering to veterans, her take on national politics lacks imagination and nuance. 

This is no time in our nation's history to fear brains. It is time to work hard, to really bear down and figure out how to rebuild a future of national stability. It is definitely not time to revert to the tea party tactics of "no".

Thanks to Politico for this commentary by Dan Hirschhorn, 10/30/11: 

They came to Washington to drown the government in the bathtub — and everything else was a distant second.
Within the massive freshman class of House Republicans is a much smaller subset of hardcore, self-styled citizen legislators who have done little to assure their reelection. They haven’t raised enough money or made much headway in building their next campaigns. Locals gripe that they haven’t sufficiently worked their districts. They’ve been reliable “nay” votes on whatever House leadership is pushing. None of them has qualified for the National Republican Congressional Committee’s incumbent-protection Patriot Program.
Many Republicans think they probably won’t be coming back — and say the freshmen will have no one to blame but themselves.
“They don’t care about a campaign or their reelection,” said former New York Rep. Tom Reynolds, a former NRCC chairman. “They got here their way, and they’re following through on what they said they’d do.”
Still, House campaign veterans say the laissez-faire attitude toward reelection will inevitably create some tension with a party campaign committee that has limited resources to prop up its largest majority in decades.
“There are certain standards that just need to be met for a person to win a competitive election, and it’s hard to see how they meet those standards,” said former NRCC Political Director Ed Brookover. “It’s always frustrating because [the NRCC] wants to help members, but members also have to help themselves.”
“It’s fine to bury your head in the sand and say you’re doing it differently, but these people aren’t aware of the millions of dollars that were spent on their behalf to get them there,” said Mike McElwain, another former NRCC political director. “It’s amazing to me the number of people who won and the only thing they recognize is their own campaigns. They don’t think about the state parties, the independent expenditures, the millions of dollars that were spent to get them there.”
Longtime Hill veterans and GOP operatives share the same lament: This happens after every wave election. Former Democratic Florida Rep. Alan Grayson, elected in the 2008 wave, was a bombastic presence on cable news but ultimately fell short in the nitty-gritty of reelection politics. Class of 1994 Republicans recall former Indiana Rep. John Hostettler as someone who never adapted to a two-year campaign cycle and held on to his seat for more than a decade thanks only to consistent bailouts from the NRCC.
“Any time you see a large group of legislators come in on a wave, there are many that aren’t prepared to adapt their message to the new realities without abandoning their principles,” said former Pennsylvania Rep. Phil English, a Washington-based lobbyist who informally advises some freshmen. “You frequently see people who are carried in and don’t want to play the political game. It’s an attractive facade to put up the first time around, but people have an expectation of what they want their elected representative to be, including someone who listens, and in a modern campaign environment, if you don’t have a war chest, you’re not in a position to respond.”
Most Republicans agree the freshman class has actually done better than expected at adapting to the permanent campaign necessary to stay in Washington, with the problems isolated to about six rookies. With a 25-seat majority, one top Republican quipped, “We probably have half a dozen to spare.”
“There’s always a small group of folks who aren’t quite there, but it’s a smaller group than I thought it would be, and the good news is there’s plenty of time to get with the program,” said former New York Rep. Bill Paxon, a former NRCC chairman.
“There’s a romance to not raising money and not raising PAC money,” English said. “But as a practical matter, all you’re effectively doing is depriving yourself of the ability to answer criticisms. This is a serious problem.”
Among those drawing quiet scorn on the GOP fundraising circuit are New York Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle, a nurse who upset former Democratic Rep. Dan Maffei last year but who raised a paltry $89,000 last quarter and has already drawn a rematch with Maffei; Rep. Joe Walsh, the cable news mainstay buffeted by personal and financial issues who raised just $150,000 last quarter and faces a tough primary against fellow GOP freshman Rep. Randy Hultgren; and Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar, who has raised less than $500,000 since upsetting former Democratic Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, and now faces a rematch with Kirkpatrick, who is outpacing him in the money race.
The freshmen mostly acknowledge their fundraising challenges and promise things are about to pick up. After a taste of the budget-cutting axe, some political neophytes who would have been happy with one-term Hill careers are now convinced they need more time in Washington to finish a job that will get easier if their party can send President Barack Obama packing.
“I know why I came here,” Walsh told POLITICO. “I don’t want to be a professional politician, and I’m not going to be here for life. But that doesn’t conflict with the fact that I have to raise money to tell my constituents what kind of citizen-legislator I am.”
“I haven’t talked to anybody who says, ‘I don’t care if I get reelected,’” said freshman Pennsylvania Rep. Mike Kelly, who has turned in decent fundraising numbers but also has his own money to draw on from years as a successful car dealer. “Most folks, after being here for nine months, realize there’s so much more work to do and want to stay. Most people are starting to realize the clock is ticking. But there’s real work to be done, and it’s a balancing act,” said Kelly, who so far has drawn no serious challengers.
Some freshmen may win reelection in spite of themselves. North Carolina Rep. Renee Ellmers has been criticized for skimping on town halls and raised only $97,000 last quarter. But Ellmers, a nurse who squeaked by former Democratic Rep. Bob Etheridge last year, was buoyed by a redistricting process that made her mid-state seat significantly safer.
“I’m working hard, but it is difficult with so many freshmen competing for the same dollars,” Ellmers said. “All I can say is next quarter will be better. The only way we’re going to really make the changes we need [is] after 2012.”
Freshmen should consider how better campaigns could make them better lawmakers, said former Virginia Rep. Tom Davis, a former NRCC chairman.
“You’ll never be an effective legislator if you’re always being targeted and people think your tenure could be short-lived,” he said. “That aura of invincibility is just part of being a good legislator. If you’re walking around with a bull’s-eye on your back, you’re not going to be as effective.”
Florida Rep. Allen West, the conservative fundraising star of the freshman class, had similar advice.
“Raising money is the mother’s milk,” he said. “If you’re hoping to come back and fight for fiscal responsibility, you just have to do it.”
And with the White House and Senate up for grabs, operatives close to the GOP’s growing stable of independent expenditure groups are expecting less money to go around for House races on the bubble.
“It’s going to pale in comparison to what was spent on the House last year,” McElwain said.
Some freshmen say they’re doing just fine, contrary to what their Republican critics might say.
“Between working here full time and building a campaign full time,” Gosar said, “I think I’m doing pretty good.”

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Ann Marie Buerkle Is Not Interested in You, Average Constituent

Blueskygirl is at a loss today, as she is many days, to understand why Ann Marie Buerkle continues to be such a powerful force in the lives of her right-leaning constituents.

Democracy requires participants to question the motivation of candidates, their qualifications, their ability to translate their life experiences into good policy and governance. 

In addition, democracy asks voters to separate their emotional reaction to candidates from a long hard look at whether candidates have the voters' interests at heart.

Ann Marie Buerkle represents a district in upstate New York straddling the NY Thruway, once a thriving manufacturing corridor from Albany to Buffalo.

Today that district is solidly in a region we know as the rust belt. Recently the carcass of Carrier Corporation, world leader in air conditioning, was sold for scrap. 

Oneida silverware, Buffalo china and Syracuse china are all manufactured in China. New Venture gears eventually came from overseas, made of inferior steel, and the last of New Venture Gear disappears by the end of this year. Crucible Steel's high quality steel is barely competitive with foreign, inferior steel. National Grid laid off 800 workers this year.

Inner cities are mostly in ruin, their inner city schools and neighborhoods increasingly deserted by professional parents who want the best education for their children, and who can blame them? Outlying malls surround empty storefronts in our  downtowns.

Rurally, small farmers struggle because their competition is huge and protected. Even the big farms here (with, astoundingly, 3 big barns!, which no one in the old days would have called a small farm,) struggle to compete.

In this landscape Ann Marie Buerkle, conservative, tea party sweetheart and "the pretty lady from Syracuse", tells us that she will never vote to raise taxes on the extremely wealthy people and corporations of this nation.

Glaringly missing from her vocabulary are words like poverty, homelessness, teacher layoffs, soup kitchens, living wage, unemployment. Missing from her intent in Washington are solving the home mortgage crisis, creating real jobs, improving the lot of farmers, and making good educations, from kindergarten to BAs, BSs, MAs, and yes, even MDs, accessible for the less and least fortunate among us. Missing is support for unions.

Rather, every single one of her decisions is made in favor of corporate interests. Thus she paves the way for increased contributions to her next campaign. Thus she pleases John Boehner.

Tea partiers, conservatives, Republicans: wake up and look at what Ann Marie Buerkle does every day. Is she looking out for your best interests and those of your neighbor? If she is not, push back and wake HER up. She needs to hear from you. 

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Good News Dept.: Boot the Fringe

Blueskygirl has been wondering when the Republican party would wake from its deep sleep and reclaim the party from the tea-stained fringe. It is happening in New Hampshire!

Thanks to correspondent Jon Ward and Huffington Post for this article published August 25, 2011, [emphasis added by Blueskygirl]:

New Hampshire Senator, Congressmen Support Removing State GOP Chairman Jack Kimball

WASHINGTON -- The lone Republican senator from New Hampshire and the state's two Republican members of Congress on Thursday put their names behind a vote on the removal of the state party's chairman, even as the Tea Party-affiliated leader continued to defend himself. ...

The letter to Kimball bore 22 names from the 36-member state executive committee in support of a vote on his remova.... Only 19 votes are needed to oust Kimball as state party chairman.

In a separate statement, the five elected leaders called the controversy around Kimball's tenure as chairman a "serious distraction" and said he should resign.

“We respect Jack Kimball, and appreciate all the personal time and effort he has made on behalf of the New Hampshire Republican Party. But to ensure that all of the party's energy and resources are solely focused on electing Republicans, we believe it is time to move beyond this serious distraction," the statement said. “Therefore, we call upon Jack to put the best interests of New Hampshire Republicans first and step aside as chairman of the party." ...

But, [member of Republican committee Bill] Foley said, "the Chairman continues to refuse to reach out except to a very narrow group of what I consider to be radical fringe element of the Party who have overestimated their value and importance in the last election...."

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Tea Party Tim and Plutocrat Pete

MON AUG 15, 2011 AT 06:50 AM PDT

Tea Party Tim and Plutocrat Pete

by Tom Tomorrow


Everlasting thanks to Tom Tomorrow and the comics section of Daily Kos.

Friday, August 5, 2011

August Questions for Buerkle

August Questions for Buerkle
  • Without added revenue, how do you propose to pay for our nation's commitments to wars in four countries on two continents?  
  • Why are you instilling fear in middle class tax payers by not acknowledging that the only revenue increases on the table are aimed at the wealthiest Americans and corporations?
  • Without cutting your own district's discretionary spending, how do you intend to convince your colleagues to cut theirs?
  • What will you think about proposed horizontal hydrofracking behind your Skaneateles Lake camp, just over the hill in the Owasco watershed?
  • Why did you vote against the final debt ceiling bill when, only a few days before, you were confident something would pass prior to the Tuesday deadline and you were for it?  
  • Was your no vote because you fear alienating the last of the people who ever believed in you?
  • Have you cashed Sarah Palin's June 29 check to your campaign yet?
  • Why haven't you joined Michele Bachmann's Tea Party Caucus?
  • Who are your national and international economic advisors?
  • When is your next in-person Town Hall meeting?

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Psssst, We Already ELECTED the Folks Who Changed the Law!


Tea party compatriots, is there something about electoral politics in New York State that you don't understand? Can we try to explain it to you?


PS: If you really want the people to vote on same-sex marriage, here is how it will work out: "In New York, passage of the bill reflects rapidly evolving sentiment about same-sex unions. In 2004, according to a Quinnipiac poll, 37 percent of the state’s residents supported allowing same-sex couples to wed. This year, 58 percent of them did." (New York Times, June 24, 2011)

How's that democracy thing working out for you?

STAND UP
AND BE HEARD
RALLY ON 07.24.11 @ 3:00pm
Governor Cuomo and the New York Legislature imposed same-sex marriage on New York with no vote of the people. Voters in 31 other states have been able to decide the definition of marriage for their states, but New Yorkers have been denied that right!
Stand up to protest the redefinition of marriage and demand your right to vote!
If New York is going to change the definition of marriage, it should be the People and not the politicians who make the decision!
Let the People Vote! Join us on July 24 [at 3pm] in NYC, Albany, Rochester and Buffalo to let your voice be heard! Additional details coming soon...

Friday, July 8, 2011

Thank You, Post-Standard

Gun-Barrell Politics: Holding government debt hostage is irresponsible

Editorial in today's paper by the Post-Standard Editorial Board 
with a paragraph directed toward Ann Marie Buerkle

“This display of people standing up and saying we cannot raise the debt limit, that is not responsible, after voting to spend and spend and spend, it is just more than I could take.” These words come from leading Republican Jeff Flake of Arizona — speaking during the administration of George W. Bush.
Republicans have joined Democrats in raising the nation’s debt ceiling 74 times since 1962 — seven times during the administration of former president George W. Bush. It is galling to listen to their sermons about fiscal responsibility when their leadership produced a hefty share of the nation’s staggering $14.3 trillion debt.
Tax cuts pushed by the brand-new Bush administration drained $2 trillion from the Treasury over the past decade. The trillion-dollar wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, launched in the early years of the Bush administration, were financed by borrowing — until President Barack Obama insisted on including the costs in the yearly defense budget. Bush’s Medicare drug benefit plan has cost hundreds of billions so far — without any way to pay for it.
It’s not too late for GOP lawmakers to hold their noses and raise the debt limit. After all, they promised not to endanger the nation’s credit-worthiness when they swore to defend the Constitution, which states that “the validity of the public debt of the United States ... shall not be questioned.”
But to win over even a few Republicans, the president must commit himself to an austerity plan that would slash and burn federal spending for a decade. Now GOP lawmakers are flirting with demands for a balanced budget — not seen since the last year of Democrat Bill Clinton’s administration. And forget about tax increases, according to the 41 senators and 236 House members who signed a no-tax pledge. Even ending tax breaks for corporate jet owners, hedge fund managers and oil companies would have to be matched by lower taxes elsewhere or more spending cuts.
Polls suggest voters are more amenable to raising taxes than tea party activists think — particularly for the rich and corporations making record profits. Besides, federal tax dollars pay for things people like. GOP lawmakers, including Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle, R-Onondaga Hill, discovered constituents were appalled by the Republicans’ plan to restructure Medicare and other popular social programs. Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget plan has gone nowhere.
Ending Bush-era tax breaks for millionaires when they expire at the end of the year might raise $50 billion a year — not nearly enough. Erase the cuts for all taxpayers and revenues grow to $300 billion a year. Add smart and significant spending cuts, including the defense budget as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan wind down, and you’re on your way to fiscal balance.
The job can be done, and must be done. But not at the end of a political gun-barrel. “We’re going to have to deal with (the debt limit) as adults,” said current House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio — last November. Why not now?

Friday, June 24, 2011

Buerkle: Keeping Them Barefoot and Pregnant


By her lonely vote against government supports for broadband in rural areas, affecting small businesses and farmers, Ann Marie essentially votes to keep rural areas in the last century and uncompetitive.

Thanks to the Watertown Daily Times for this coverage.
Owens supports broadband program
HOUSE VOTE: $6m in spending measure will help grants, loans
TIMES WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT
FRIDAY, JUNE 17, 2011
WASHINGTON — Rep. William L. Owens on Thursday helped salvage $6 million for a program that could help expand high-speed Internet service in parts of Northern New York.
The House approved a measure that Mr. Owens, D-Plattsburgh, co-sponsored with Rep. Chris Gibson, R-Kinderhook, to save the U.S. Department of Agriculture's rural broadband grant and loan program from elimination in the House Republicans' annual spending bill for agriculture programs.
The $6 million the lawmakers secured pales when compared with the $22.3 million the program received this year, but it ensures that at least some communities still will be able to compete for funds. The bill covers the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1.
Critics said the great majority of the country has broadband access, and they attacked the program for failing to focus on the most isolated rural areas, echoing a federal report that cited the program's shortcomings. In some cases, outlying areas of major cities have received funding through the rural program.
"This program is not necessary. And in a time when we're talking about saving money, we do not need to increase this account," said Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Ga., chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on agriculture.
Mr. Kingston said New York is 99.8 percent covered by broadband access, with similar rates in other states. And he said lawmakers have received complaints over the years about the department's unresponsiveness to program applicants. In some cases, he said, "they get approved but they can't get their money."
The vote on the broadband measure was 221-198. New York's upstate delegation mostly supported the broadband funding, with the exception of Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle, R-Syracuse, who voted against it. ....
To see the complete article go here.

Buerkle would apparently vote against her own grandmother if it meant keeping the Tea Party conservatives off her back.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Chuckle of the Day


Governor Nikki Haley speaks during a meeting of the Tea Party in Columbia [SC] Thursday night at the Statehouse. A.L. Geddings and Louise Geddings of Columbia were representative of the low turnout. Turnout was low at the event due to Donald Trump canceling his expected appearance.
- Tracy Glantz /Tracy Glantz/tglantz@thestate.co

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Industrial Conglomerate Tea Party Sponsor Has NO Sense of Humor

Koch Industries can buy and sell the Tea Party and its puppet teabaggers with loose change from the sofa. Good to know they don't always win in court.

Thanks to Huffington Post for this:
Koch Industries Climate Change Spoof No Grounds For Suit, Judge Finds
First Posted: 05/ 9/11 06:55 PM ET Updated: 05/ 9/11 06:55 PM ET
Tom Zeller Jr. 
tom.zeller@huffingtonpost.com
A U.S. district court in Utah effectively shut down an effort by Koch Industries, the Kansas-based industrial conglomerate whose namesake brothers are vocal skeptics of global warming, to unmask a group of anonymous climate activists who spoofed the company in a mock press release last December. [Here is the fake announcement:]




December 10, 2010     Contact: 
Kate Anderson
281-305-8418
KOCH INDUSTRIES ANNOUNCES NEW ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
WICHITA, Kan. – Koch Industries remains committed to environmental responsibility and stewardship, announcing today that it will restructure its support for organizations that undertake climate change research and advocacy.
Since its founding, Koch Industries has been focused on achieving environmental excellence and using resources efficiently. Through extensive and award-winning efforts and investments, Koch Industries has implemented innovative practices that reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in the manufacture and distribution of our products.
Based on recent internal evaluations of Koch Industries priorities, the company will be restructuring its support of climate change research and advocacy initiatives and will discontinue contributions to groups whose positions on climate change no longer match those of the company’s leadership, beginning in January 2011.
Koch Industries is proud of its charitable history, particularly with regard to organizations such as Americans for Prosperity, Fraser Institute, Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment, the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, and the George C. Marshall Institute.  These organizations have done much important work to advance science and policy on the issue of climate change.
However, based on a recent internal and thorough company review, Koch Industries has decided that its best course forward includes a discontinuation of funding for these organizations, and organizations like them, whose positions on climate change could jeopardize America’s continued global competitiveness in the energy and chemical sectors and Koch Industries’ ability to provide high-quality products and services to the American people.
“Koch Industries is proud of its environmental record, as well as its long history of providing trusted goods and services to its customers,” said CEO Charles Koch.  “Our top priority has always been to create real, long-term value in society through principled behavior. It is the only way a business can survive and prosper.”
More complete information is available at www.koch-inc.com.
###
Page 1 of 1


The fake statement, posted to a hoax Web site similar to Koch Industries' own, purported to be an awakening of sorts, in which the company admitted the error of its ways on climate change and committed to cease funding of groups seeking to undermine prevailing climate science.
Unamused, Koch sued for a variety of claims, including infringement of trademark, unfair competition and cybersquatting, among others. Koch had also sought to serve subpoenas on the company that hosted the sham website in order to obtain the identities of the activists.
The defendants, represented by the advocacy group Public Citizen, sought to have the subpoenas quashed, the activists' identities protected and the lawsuit -- along with all of its claims -- dismissed.
On Monday, U.S. District Judge Dale A. Kimball granted all three requests.
"We're gratified that the court affirmed our clients' First Amendment right to engage in anonymous political speech and rejected Koch's baseless legal theories," said Deepak Gupta, Public Citizen's lead attorney, in an emailed statement. "This lawsuit was nothing but a well-financed attempt by Koch to bully its political opponents into submission. The court was right to stop this lawsuit in its tracks."
In a follow-up phone call, Mr. Gupta said that Koch almost certainly obtained some information on the activists though the subpoenas it served to the hosting company, which complied before Public Citizen became involved in the case. But Koch is now enjoined from disclosing whatever information it had managed to gather.
"We are disappointed by the judge's decision and continue to stand by our earlier statements about this case," said Melissa Cohlmia, a spokeswoman for Koch Industries, in an email message. The company, she added, was reviewing its options.

...yes, there is a god

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Editorial Cartoon by Clay Bennett, Chattanooga Times Free Press

Friday, April 8, 2011

Ann Marie Buerkle, Let's Talk Men's Issues!

OK, so the budget stalemate is all coming down to the issue of abortion, is it?
Everybody knows, or ought to understand by now, that the War on Abortion is a war on women.
How about this: let's talk men's issues!
Henceforth:

  • all prostate surgeries will take place in the town square (to put another slant on Live Action Princess Lila Rose's talk).
  • any user of Viagra will have to be licensed. Any user will be required to view the results of his labors via ultrasound.
  • all sperm must be accounted for daily (and I do mean every single one).
  • sperm banks will go into mandatory bankruptcy.
  • all rapes will be tried by female tribunals
  • men will be 100% responsible for birth control
  • men will spend 2 hours a week in community service teaching boys to respect girls and women, and handing out condoms at malls and high schools
  • boys and men will voluntarily clean the toilet bowl rims at home every day
  • boys and men must live with a Baby Think It Over Infant simulator doll for 3 months; if anyone neglects the "baby", he has to start over.

Florynce Kennedy said: "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament."


I have no idea who wrote this; I cannot take credit for it. It's good:
               If men got pregnant:
  • Maternity leave would last for two years...with full pay.
  • There'd be a cure for stretch marks
  • Natural childbirth would become obsolete
  • Morning sickness would rank as the nation's number one health problem
  • All methods of birth control would be improved to 100 percent effectiveness
  • Children would be kept in the hospital until they were toilet trained
  • Men would be EAGER to talk about commitment
  • They wouldn't think twins were quite so cute
  • Fathers would demand that their SONS be home from dates by 10:00pm
  • Men could use THEIR briefcases as diaper bags
  • They'd have to stop saying,"I'm afraid I'll drop him."
  • Paternity suits would be a line of clothes
  • They'd stay in bed for the entire nine months
  • Menus at most restaurants would list ice cream and pickles as an entree
  • Women would rule the world!
Finally, Florynce Kennedy, amazing and beautiful woman, said, "There are very few jobs that actually require a penis or vagina. All other jobs should be open to everybody." 

Another great Florynce Kennedy quote: "When a system of oppression has become institutionalized it is unnecessary for individuals to be oppressive."

A biography of Flo Kennedy is here:  http://revcom.us/a/v22/1090-99/1095/flo_kennedy.htm